Stark

Stark v. Patreon, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20253:22-cv-03131California986 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BRAYDEN STARK, et al., 7 Case No. 22-cv-03131-JCS Plaintiffs, 8 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR 9 PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OR,

PATREON, INC., IN THE ALTERNATIVE, FOR

10 PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 228

12 13 On June 5, 2025, the Court approved the class action settlement in this case and ruled on 14 the validity of opt-out forms submitted by Lexclaim. Dkt. no. 227 (“June 5 Order”). Among other 15 things, the Court found that the 927 opt-out forms from individual class members who purportedly 16 assigned their claims in this action to Lexclaim, as well as the opt-out form that was submitted in 17 Lexclaim’s own name, were invalid “group opt-outs” that are prohibited under the Settlement 18 Agreement. Presently before the Court is Lexclaim’s Motion for Leave to File Motion for Partial 19 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.