(SS) Corchado v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20251:21-cv-00213California1,708 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 CLARISA CORCHADO, Case No. 1:21-cv-00213-EPG 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION 10

FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT

11 v. TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

12 (ECF No. 30) Defendant. 13 14 On May 12, 2025, Attorney Jonathan O. Peña, counsel for Plaintiff Clarisa Corchado, 15 filed a motion for an award of $39,955.75 in attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 16 30). Plaintiff and the Commissioner of Social Security were each served with a copy of the 17 motion. (Id. at 9; ECF No. 35). Plaintiff has not filed any response to the motion. On May 14, 18 2025, the Commissioner filed a response providing analysis regarding the fee request but taking 19 no position on its reasonableness. (ECF No. 33). Plaintiff did not file an optional reply by the 20 June 18, 2025 deadline. (ECF No. 31). 21 For the reasons set forth below, the motion for an award of attorney’s fees will be granted, 22 in part, in the amount of $31,964.60,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.