Charman
Charman v. California Check Cashing Stores, LLC.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THANE CHARMAN, Case No. 24-cv-00695-BAS-MMP
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
13 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS (ECF No. 29) 14 LEADSMARKET.COM, LLC, 15 Defendant. 16 17
18 Presently before the Court is Defendant Leadsmarket.com, LLC (“Leadsmarket”)’s 19 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Thane Charman’s First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 29.) 20 Plaintiff opposes, and Leadsmarket replies.1 (ECF Nos. 32, 34.) For the following reasons, 21 the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Leadsmarket’s Motion to Dismiss. 22 I. BACKGROUND 23 Plaintiff, a resident of San Diego, California, brings this action under the Telephone 24 Consumer Protection Act of 1991 (“TCPA”), 47 U.S.C. § 227, which restricts phone 25 solicitations and the use of automated telephone equipment. (First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) 26 ¶ 1, ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff alleges he registered his phone number on the National Do- 27 1 The Court finds this…