(PC) Harris v. City of Madera

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20251:22-cv-00660California843 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIAL JAFAIN HARRIS, No. 1:22-cv-00660 JLT GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

13 v. TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 CITY OF MADERA, et al., (ECF No. 18) 15 Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST

FOR THE APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

16 (ECF No. 18 at 1) 17

PLAINTIFF’S AMENDED COMPLAINT

18 DUE IN TWENTY-ONE DAYS 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 21 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 22 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 23 Before this Court is Plaintiff’s motion for a thirty-day extension of time to file a first 24 amended complaint (“FAC”). ECF No. 18. The motion also requests that Plaintiff be appointed 25 counsel. Id.at 1. For the reasons stated below, the Court will grant the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.