Rodriguez
Rodriguez v. Corpus
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EDWIN NORBERTO RODRIGUEZ, Case No. 25-cv-03008-WHO (PR)
Plaintiff, 12
ORDER DISMISSING THE
v. 13 COMPLAINT WITH LEAVE TO
AMEND
14 CRISTINA CORPUS, et al.,
Defendants. 15
16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Plaintiff Edwin Norberto Rodriguez alleges unrelated claims against different 19 defendants at the San Mateo County Sheriff’s Office. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint 20 containing these allegations is now before me for review pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 21 1915A(a). 22 Rodriguez raises a number of unrelated claims against multiple defendants. 23 Because this falls afoul of federal pleading rules, the complaint is DISMISSED with leave 24 to file an amended complaint on or before August 18, 2025. Failure to file a proper 25 amended complaint by August 18, 2025, may result in dismissal of this action under 26 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) for failure to prosecute. 27 I will rule on Rodriguez’s motion for the appointment of counsel after I have 1 …