Naro
Naro v. Walgreen Co
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SERENA NARO, et al., Case No. 22-cv-03170-JST
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
9 v. MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION AND
10 WALGREEN CO, et al., PAGA REPRESENTATIVE ACTION
SETTLEMENT
Defendants. 11 Re: ECF No. 66 12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ unopposed motion for preliminary approval of class action 14 settlement. ECF No. 60. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion. 15 I. BACKGROUND 16 Plaintiffs Serena Naro and Trish Gonzales, representatives of the California Labor & 17 Workforce Development Agency (collectively “Plaintiffs”), bring suit against Defendants 18 Walgreen Co., Walgreen Pharmacy Services Midwest, LCC, and Does 1–15 (collectively, 19 “Defendants”). ECF No. 33 ¶ 1. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to “reimburse for 20 necessary business expenses, namely expenses incurred in purchasing replacement uniforms 21 which Defendants[] required Plaintiffs to wear each shift.” Id. ¶ 5. …