Oscar Quevedo v. California Cemetery and Funeral Services LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 10 OSCAR QUEVEDO, individually, and on ) Case No. CV 24-10509 FMO (MARx) 11 behalf of all others similarly situated, ) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO 13 v. ) REMAND ) 14 CALIFORNIA CEMETERY AND )
FUNERAL SERVICES, LLC, )
15 ) Defendant. ) 16 ) 17 Having reviewed and considered all the briefing filed with respect to Oscar Quevedo’s 18 (“plaintiff”) Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court (Dkt. 13, “Motion”), the court 19 concludes that oral argument is not necessary to resolve the Motion, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 78(b); 20 L. R. 7-15; Willis v. Pac. Mar. Ass’n, 244 F.3d 675, 684 n. 2 (9th Cir. 2001), and concludes as 21 follows. 22 BACKGROUND 23 On October 22, 2024, plaintiff filed a putative a wage-and-hour class action in state court 24 against California Cemetery and Funeral Services, LLC (“defendant”), asserting claims for 25 violations of the California Labor Code and California’s…