Flores

Flores v. County of Kern

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20251:24-cv-00995California877 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MALISSA FLORES, Case No. 1:24-cv-00995-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE REQUEST FOR 13 v. RESOLUTION OF DISCOVERY

DISPUTE

14 COUNTY OF KERN, et al., (Docs. 23, 24) 15 Defendants.

16 17 Pending before the Court is a discovery dispute that the parties have agreed to submit to the 18 Court for adjudication through the Court’s informal discovery dispute procedure. (Docs. 23, 24). 19 The dispute involves the request by Defendants County of Kern, Isaac Azura, Dylan Rice, and 20 Yousef Abou Harb (“Defendants”) for terminating and other sanctions following the failures by 21 Plaintiff Malissa Flores (“Plaintiff”) to appear for her original, duly noticed deposition and a re- 22 noticed deposition following her first failure to appear. Id. 23 The parties appeared via video teleconference (Zoom) for an informal discovery dispute 24 conference on July 8, 2025. Plaintiff appeared through counsel Gregory Paul Peacock and 25 Defendants appeared through…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.