Matthew

Matthew v. Palomares

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 7, 20253:25-cv-01665California1,702 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 saa Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S 12 V. MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS AND DISMISSING CASE

13 HRIST □□ AIEEE DOMED Sil FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 On June 30, 2025, Plaintiff Jacob Matthew, proceeding pro se, filed a Complaint for 18 the seizure of his automobile on tribal land. (Plaintiff's Complaint (“Compl.”)). Plaintiff 19 ||concurrently filed a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (“IFP”’) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 20 || 1915(a).! 21 ———— 22 ' Alongside his Complaint, Motion to Proceed IFP, Motion for Preliminary Injunction, Application for 23 || Temporary Restraining Order, and other filings, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Seal this entire action. “[A] party seeking to file under seal materials related to dispositive motions must provide ‘compelling reasons’ 24 do so.” Rieckborn v. Velti PLC, 2014 WL 4964313, at *1 (N.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2014)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.