E.M.
E.M. v. California Department of Education
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 E.M.,1 et al., Case No. 24-cv-07397-NW
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
9 v. DISMISS
10 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF Re: ECF No. 22, 27, 36, 47 EDUCATION, et al., 11 Defendants.
12 13 Before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by University Preparatory Academy 14 (“UPA”), David Porter, Rachel Juliano, Alisha Hill, and Lucas Kelleher (“UPA Individual 15 Defendants”) (collectively “the UPA Defendants”), ECF No. 27; the California Department of 16 Education (“CDE”) and State Superintendent of Public Instruction Tony Thurmond in his 17 individual capacity (collectively “the State Defendants”), ECF No. 22; Santa Clara County Office 18 of Education (“SCCOE”) and Santa Clara County Board of Education (“SCCBOE”) (collectively 19 “the Santa Clara Defendants”), ECF No. 36; and Dr. Mary Ann Dewan, ECF No. 47. Having duly 20 considered the parties’ written submissions, the Court GRANTS the motions and DISMISSES the 21 complaint with partial leave to amend. 22 23 24 25…