(PC) Smith v. Tuolumne County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20251:25-cv-00359California1,595 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NATHANIEL LEE SMITH, Case No. 1:25-cv-00359-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO VOID ORDERS1

13 v. (Doc. No. 11) 14 TUOLUMNE COUNTY JAIL,

TUOLUMNE COUNTY DA,

15 TUOLUMNE COUNTY SUPERIOR

COURT, AND SGT. N. ROHR,

16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Nathaniel Smith—a pretrial detainee—has filed a civil rights complaint pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, which is currently pending before the Court. (Doc. No. 1, “Complaint”). 20 Plaintiff seeks to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. 21 On March 31, 2025, the former magistrate judge entered an order vacating in part its 22 March 28, 2025 Order granting Plaintiff in forma pauperis status, but only to the limited extent 23 that it granted Plaintiff sixty (60) days in which to file his six-month inmate trust fund account 24 statement; and required Plaintiff instead to file the six-month statement in thirty (30) days. (Doc. 25 No. 5). On April 24, 2025, the undersigned denied Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the March 31,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.