Jimenez
Jimenez v. Hyatt Corp.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLOR JIMENEZ, Case No. 2:23-cv-03028-TLN-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
COMPEL
14 HYATT CORPORATION, (ECF No. 36) 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Flor Jimenez’s motion to compel Defendant 18 Hyatt Corporation to further respond to Plaintiff’s Requests for Production (“RFP”), Set 19 One, and Plaintiff’s Interrogatories, Set One.1 (ECF No. 36.) A hearing was held on June 20 20, 2025. (ECF No. 43.) Jesenia Martinez appeared as counsel for Plaintiff, and Nathan 21 Chapman and Jonathan Marvisi appeared as counsel for Defendant. (Id.) At the June 22 20, 2025 hearing, the Court granted in part and denied in part a portion of Plaintiff’s 23 motion to compel, and ordered Plaintiff to file a supplemental brief to address the 24 remaining discovery requests in dispute (RFP Nos. 7-16, 18-19, and 21-24). (ECF No. 25 45.) For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 26 Plaintiff’s motion to…