Watson

Watson v. Connect Property and Casualty Ins. Co.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20252:25-cv-00430California2,120 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GLADYS WATSON and SHELDON No. 2:25-cv-00430-DJC-AC

WATSON,

12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER v. 14

CONNECT PROPERTY & CASUALTY

15 INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Gladys Watson and Sheldon Watson, bring this action pursuant to the 19 Federal Arbitration Act against Defendant Connect Property and Casualty Insurance 20 Company.1 Pending before the Court is a Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Arbitration. 21 (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons stated below, the Court denies Plaintiffs’ Motion. 22 BACKGROUND 23 On February 23, 2023, Plaintiff Gladys Watson was involved in an automobile 24 collision with Casey Edenfield, a third party. (Compl. (ECF No. 1, Ex. A) ¶ 8; see Am. 25

26 1 Defendant Connect was sued under the name “Connect Property and Casualty Company” but Defendant Connect represents that their proper name is “American Family Connect Property and 27 Casualty Insurance Company.” (ECF No. 13 at 1.) The Clerk of the Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.