(PS) Wayne v. Sierra County

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 8, 20252:25-cv-01113California776 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD WAYNE, et al., No. 2:25-cv-1113-DAD-CKD PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER

14 SIERRA BROOKS PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs Richard Wayne and Michal Wayne proceed pro se and bring multiple claims 18 against various defendants. This case is referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 19 and Local Rule 302(c)(21). Plaintiffs’ request to participate in electronic filing (ECF No. 18), 20 motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 24), motion styled as a motion for leave to preserve 21 late filing of an opposition (ECF No 54), and motion for administrative relief (ECF No. 89) are 22 before the court. 23 Electronic Filing 24 “[A]ny person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing except with the 25 permission of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.” See E.D. Cal. L.R. 133(b)(2). The court 26 does not at this time find good cause for deviance from the general procedure in the Local Rule. 27 Plaintiffs’ request…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.