Kate Adams v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202523-15970California10,161 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KATE ADAMS, No. 23-15970

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:22-cv-01499- v. WBS-KJN

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; ORDER AND

SCOTT JONES, Sheriff, AMENDED

OPINION

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California William B. Shubb, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 16, 2024 San Francisco, California

Filed September 9, 2024 Amended July 9, 2025

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Consuelo M. Callahan, and Gabriel P. Sanchez, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Sidney R. Thomas; Dissent by Judge Consuelo M. Callahan SUMMARY *

First Amendment/Employment Retaliation

The panel amended its prior opinion filed on September 9, 2024, and published at 116 F.4th 1004 (9th Cir. 2024), denied a petition for panel rehearing, denied a petition for rehearing en banc, and ordered that no further petitions shall be entertained in this interlocutory appeal in which the panel affirmed the district court’s dismissal of First…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.