Bondi

Soto Cedeno v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-1018California1,517 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHAN SOTO CEDENO, No. 24-1018 Agency No. Petitioner, A241-361-947 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Immigration Judge

Argued and Submitted February 14, 2025 Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges, and LASNIK, District Judge.** Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge R. Nelson.

Johan Soto Cedeno, a native and citizen of Venezuela, petitions for review of

an immigration judge’s (IJ) order concurring in an asylum officer’s negative

reasonable fear determination. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We

grant the petition and remand for further proceedings.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Robert S. Lasnik, United States District Judge for the Western District of Washington, sitting by designation. 1. Soto Cedeno argues that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.