Rivera-Melendez

Rivera-Melendez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-643California977 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NORIS RIVERA-MELENDEZ; BRAYAN No. 24-643 ANTONIO ARRIAGA-RIVERA, Agency Nos.

A220-590-603

Petitioners, A220-590-604 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Lead petitioner Noris Rivera-Melendez, and her minor child, Brayan

Antonio Arriaga-Rivera, natives and citizens of El Salvador, petition for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of their appeal of the

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.