Santamaria-Ramirez

Santamaria-Ramirez v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-2700California439 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARTA ALICIA SANTAMARIA- No. 24-2700 RAMIREZ, et al., Agency Nos.

A208-689-027 & A208-689-028

Petitioners,

v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Marta Alicia Santamaria-Ramirez and her son, natives and citizens of

Honduras, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order

dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.