Singh

Singh v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-4955California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JAGJIT SINGH, No. 24-4955 Agency No. Petitioner, A202-052-997 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, BEA, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jagjit Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA)’s dismissal of his appeal challenging an

Immigration Judge (IJ)’s denial of his claims for asylum and withholding of

removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1). We deny the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). petition.

Singh filed a Form I-589 application for asylum and withholding of removal

in May…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.