Bondi

Sandoval Pineda v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-3826California481 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEIDY SANDOVAL PINEDA and M.E.S., No. 24-3826 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A240-045-108

A220-962-219

v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Lead petitioner Leidy Sandoval Pineda (“Lead Petitioner”) and her minor

daughter, citizens of Colombia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of their appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order

ruling their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) abandoned. This court has jurisdiction

under 8 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.