Bondi
Sandoval Pineda v. Bondi
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LEIDY SANDOVAL PINEDA and M.E.S., No. 24-3826 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A240-045-108
A220-962-219
v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 7, 2025**
Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.
Lead petitioner Leidy Sandoval Pineda (“Lead Petitioner”) and her minor
daughter, citizens of Colombia, petition for review of the Board of Immigration
Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of their appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) order
ruling their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”) abandoned. This court has jurisdiction
under 8 U.S.C. §…