Lin

Lin v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-3165California607 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

JUL 9 2025

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HUA-MING LIN, No. 24-3165 Agency No. Petitioner, A072-969-189 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***

Petitioner Hua-Ming Lin challenges the Board of Immigration Appeals’

(BIA) denial of his February 2024 Motion to Reopen as untimely and its denial to

reopen the case using its sua sponte authority.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. We review denials of motions to reopen for abuse of discretion. Lona…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.