Bondi

Balby Moreno v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-1686California544 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FABIO BALBY MORENO, et al., No. 24-1686 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A220-325-785

A220-325-786

v.

A220-325-787

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, BEA, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioners Fabio Balby Moreno, his wife Veridiana Sousa da Silva Balby,

and their minor child are natives and citizens of Brazil. They seek review of an order

by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the decision of the

Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying their applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.