Bondi

Alvarez Meza De Garcia v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-2621California563 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JESSICA ALVAREZ MEZA DE No. 24-2621 GARCIA; et al., Agency Nos.

A243-148-865

Petitioners, A243-148-866 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, BEA, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Jessica Alvarez Meza de Garcia and her minor daughter seek review

of a decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of their application for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We review the

agency’s factual findings related to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.