Bondi

Carneiro Da Silva v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-5443California553 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LEANDRO CARNEIRO DA SILVA; et al., No. 24-5443

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A216-908-373

A216-908-374

v. A216-908-375

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Leandro Carneiro Da Silva, his wife, and their minor daughter (“Petitioners”),

natives and citizens of Brazil, petition for review of the Board of Immigration

Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal of the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”)

denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.