Xitumul-Tecu

Xitumul-Tecu v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 9, 202524-5394California558 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 9 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JULIANA XITUMUL-TECU; GENESIS No. 24-5394 XITUMUL-TECU, Agency Nos.

A215-699-889

Petitioners, A215-699-888 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Juliana Xitumul-Tecu and her minor daughter, both Guatemalan citizens, seek

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision affirming the

Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). the Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252, and we deny the petition.

Our “review is limited to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.