Scott
Scott v. AT&T Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TIMOTHY SCOTT, et al., Case No. 20-cv-07094-JD
8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RE IAN ALTMAN'S EXPERT 9 v. OPINIONS
10 AT&T INC., et al., Defendants. 11
12 13 The basics about this putative class action against defendants AT&T Inc., the AT&T 14 Defined Benefit Plan, and AT&T Services, Inc. (collectively AT&T) are stated in the summary 15 judgment order and incorporated herein. Dkt. No. 245. AT&T asks to exclude the opinions of 16 plaintiff’s proffered expert, Ian Altman, under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and related cases in 17 connection with class certification and summary judgment proceedings. Dkt. Nos. 122, 154. The 18 parties’ familiarity with the record is assumed. The request to exclude is denied. 19 BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiffs and AT&T filed a number of dueling expert reports and supplemental reports in 21 connection with motions for class certification and summary judgment. See Dkt. Nos. 119-8, 119- 22 9, 119-10, 121-4. To cut to the…