Rajapakse

Rajapakse v. Freelancer

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20253:24-cv-00267California1,184 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SAMANTHA DELANE RAJAPAKSE, Case No. 24-cv-00267-WHO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT

9 v. SUA SPONTE WITH LEAVE TO

AMEND, VACATING HEARING AND

10 FREELANCER, CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT

CONFERENCE

Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. Nos. 33

12 On January 16, 2024, Plaintiff Samantha Rajapakse (“Rajapakse”), proceeding pro se, filed 13 a complaint in this case. Dkt. No. 1. She filed her First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) on 14 February 5, 2024, naming Freelancer, a foreign company d/b/a escrow.com as the defendant. See 15 Dkt. Nos. 11, 15, 16. On May 27, 2025, third party defendant Freelancer USA filed a motion to 16 dismiss the amended complaint. Dkt. No. 33. The motion is fully briefed. See Dkt. Nos. 33, 41, 17 42. Rajapakse filed an administrative motion for leave to file a second amended complaint. Dkt. 18 No. 44. On June 25, 2025, I denied the administrative motion with the intent of revisiting the 19 motion after a full review of the motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 45. 20 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.