Villars

Villars v. Bondi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20253:25-cv-04239California1,265 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

JANVIER VILLARS,

10 Case No. 25-cv-04239-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING OUTSTANDING 12 MOTIONS, DISMISSING CASE PAM BONDI, et al., 13 Defendants. 14

15 16 Pro se Plaintiff Janvier Villars continues to file motions and set hearings in contravention 17 of this Court’s rules. Since the Court most recently denied Plaintiff’s requested relief and 18 reminded him of the Civil Local Rules and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff has filed 19 the following: a motion to issue summons against additional defendants, three further 20 “emergency” motions, a self-styled writ of scire facias, a motion for “constitutional default” 21 against the state of Florida, and a motion for judgment on the pleadings. These motions allege 22 fraud perpetrated by the entire executive and judicial branches, federal officers and employees, 23 and individuals associated with a condominium building located in Miami, Florida. Plaintiff has 24 inconsistently…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.