Atherton

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL DAUWALDER, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00523-JLT-SKO 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR

13 v. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

14 J. ATHERTON, et al., (Doc. 20)

15 Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

16

17 18 Plaintiff Daniel Dauwalder is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. section 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 On January 21, 2025, Plaintiff filed a document titled “An Injunctive Request for Cease of 22 Retaliation and Interference in Due Process by Prison Officials in California Correctional 23 Institute & Identify and Charge Culprits.” (Doc. 20.) The Court construes Plaintiff’s filing to be a 24 motion for injunctive relief and will recommend that it be denied. 25 II. DISCUSSION 26 Plaintiff’s Request 27 Plaintiff alleges his incoming mail from this Court and from defense counsel has been 1 “sending a brief to the Attorney General to show cooperation…