Access Optical Networks, Inc. v. Seagate Technology LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20255:24-cv-03745California976 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 ACCESS OPTICAL NETWORKS, INC., Case No. 24-cv-03745-EKL (VKD)

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE SEALING MOTIONS

v. 10 Re: Dkt. Nos. 52, 60, 62 11 SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY LLC, Defendant. 12

13 14 Defendant Seagate Technology LLC (“Seagate”) filed two administrative motions to 15 consider whether another party’s material should be sealed, in connection with Seagate’s motion 16 to compel plaintiff Access Optical Networks, Inc.’s (“AON”) disclosure of trade secrets. Dkt. 17 Nos. 52, 62. AON filed statements in support of sealing the material at issue. Dkt. Nos. 57, 65. 18 Seagate filed responses to these statements, opposing sealing. Dkt. Nos. 58, 66. AON separately 19 filed an administrative motion to file certain materials under seal in connection with its opposition 20 to Seagate’s motion to compel. Dkt. No. 60. Seagate filed an opposition to this administrative 21 motion. Dkt. No. 61. 22 As the parties’ sealing motions relate to a discovery matter—i.e. whether AON’s trade 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.