Seifert

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEXANDRA SEIFERT, Case No. 1:24-cv-01097-KES-CDB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

ACTION WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND

14 KENNETH GEORGE PRITCHARD, et al., (Doc. 19) 15 Defendants.

16 17 18 Plaintiff Alexandra Seifert, proceeding pro se, brings this action pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 19 §§ 241 and 242, 18 U.S.C. § 1018, 28 U.S.C. § 454, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985. Doc. 1. On 20 November 15, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to 21 dismiss the complaint without leave to amend because plaintiff failed to plead any cognizable 22 claims. Doc. 8. On March 7, 2025, the assigned magistrate judge vacated the prior findings and 23 recommendations and issued new findings and recommendations. Doc. 19. Following service on 24 plaintiff of those findings and recommendations and the partial grant of plaintiff’s request for 25 extension of time to file objections (Doc. 21), plaintiff filed numerous…