Michael Harris v. Azucena Dy Taon DDS, Inc.

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 Case No.: 2:25-cv-05937-MEMF-PD 11 MICHAEL HARRIS,

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE

COURT SHOULD NOT DECLINE TO

13 v. EXERCISE SUPPLEMENTAL

JURISDICTION OV ER PLAINTIFF’S

14 STATE LAW CLAIMS AZUCENA DY TAON DDS, INC.; and DOES 15 1 to 10,

16 Defendants.

17

18

19

20 On June 30, 2025, Plaintiff Michael Harris (“Harris”) filed a Complaint against Defendant

21 Azucena Dy Taon DDS, Inc. and Does 1 to 10, asserting: (1) a claim for injunctive relief arising out 22 of an alleged violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12010–12213; 23 (2) a claim for damages pursuant to California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. 24 Code §§ 51–52, et seq.; (3) a claim for damages pursuant to the California Disabled Persons Act, 25 Cal. Civ. Code §§ 54, et seq.; (4) a claim for damages and injunctive relief based on California 26 Health and Safety Code § 19955, et seq.; (5) a…