Gary S. Hann v. Christopher Compton

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GARY S. HANN, ) Case No. ED CV 25-0165 FMO (SHKx) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) 13 v. ) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT ) PREJUDICE 14 CHRISTOPHER COMPTON, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 17 Plaintiff filed his complaint on January 18, 2025. (See Dkt. 1, Complaint). By Order dated 18 April 10, 2025, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, on or before April 17, 2025, why this action 19 should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to complete service of the summons and complaint 20 as required by Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Dkt. 13, Court’s Order of 21 April 10, 2025). Plaintiff was admonished that “[f]ailure to file a timely response to th[e] Order to 22 Show Cause shall result in the action or the above defendant(s) being dismissed for lack of 23 prosecution and for failure to comply with the orders of the court.” (Id.) (citing Local Rule 41). 24 After the court’s initial order to show cause, the court granted…