Pohovich
(PC) Harper v. Pohovich
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL HARPER, No. 2:24-cv3668-TLN-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 S. POHOVICH, et al., 15 Defendants. 16
17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel. By order filed June 17, 2025, the 19 court denied plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis status and ordered plaintiff to 20 pay the $405.00 filing fee within 14 days to proceed in this action. (ECF No. 14.) Because 21 plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee as ordered by the court, this action should be dismissed 22 without prejudice. 23 For the reasons set forth above, it is RECOMMENDED as follows: 24 1. This action be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. 25 2. The Clerk of the Court be directed to close this case. 26 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 27 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within 14 days after 28 …