Borla

(HC) Woosley v. Borla

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20252:25-cv-00946California538 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AARON MICHAEL WOOSLEY, No. 2:25-cv-0946-DJC-CSK P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 EDWARD BORLA, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On May 7, 2025, the Magistrate Judge filed Findings and Recommendations 21 herein which were served on Petitioner and which contained notice to Petitioner that 22 any objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen 23 days. (ECF No. 14.) Petitioner filed a “Motion for Reconsideration” of the Magistrate 24 Judge’s unadopted Findings and Recommendations. (ECF No. 15) However, as the 25 Court has not yet adopted the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations, reconsideration 26 is inappropriate. Instead, the Court will consider Petitioner’s filing as objections to the 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.