Luciano Meza-Atienzo v. Pamela Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202520-71643California921 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

LUCIANO MEZA-ATIENZO, No. 20-71643 Agency No. Petitioner, A 074-414-655 v.

MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 8, 2025** San Francisco, California

Before: H.A. THOMAS and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***

Petitioner Luciano Meza-Atienzo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions

for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision upholding an

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.