Luciano Meza-Atienzo v. Pamela Bondi
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202520-71643California921 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2025
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LUCIANO MEZA-ATIENZO, No. 20-71643 Agency No. Petitioner, A 074-414-655 v.
MEMORANDUM*
PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 8, 2025** San Francisco, California
Before: H.A. THOMAS and DE ALBA, Circuit Judges, and RAKOFF, District Judge.***
Petitioner Luciano Meza-Atienzo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision upholding an
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Jed S. Rakoff, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,
withholding of…