David Reed v. Brandon Stubbs

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202523-15386California589 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID LEVOYD REED, No. 23-15386

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-00326-CDS-NJK v.

BRANDON STUBBS; et al., MEMORANDUM*

Defendants-Appellees,

and

JAMES DZURENDA, Director; et al.,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Cristina D. Silva, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted June 13, 2025 San Francisco, California

Before: S.R. THOMAS and KOH, Circuit Judges, and SILVER,** District Judge.

Plaintiff David Reed seeks reversal of the district court’s final judgment in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Roslyn O. Silver, United States District Judge for the District of Arizona, sitting by designation. this action because he claims that two of the defendants named in his complaint,

Paul Karsky and Julio Corral-Lagarda, were wrongly dismissed for failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.