Woolley

Woolley v. Bisignano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202524-3745California625 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

THOMAS WILLIAM WOOLLEY, No. 24-3745 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellant, 6:23-cv-00645-AN v.

MEMORANDUM*

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Adrienne C. Nelson, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 8, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, CLIFTON, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Thomas Woolley appeals the district court’s order affirming the

Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of his application for disability benefits.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We review the district court’s order de novo and may reverse a denial of

benefits only when that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.