Bondi

Mungia Padilla v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202523-2426California524 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KATERIN NOHEMI MUNGIA-PADILLA; No. 23-2426 D.M.M. Agency No.

A220-147-224

Petitioners, A220-147-225 v. MEMORANDUM*

PAMELA J. BONDI, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025**

Before: OWENS, LEE, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges.

Katerin Mungia-Padilla and her minor child, natives and citizens of Honduras,

petition for review of a Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) decision affirming

the order of an Immigration Judge (“IJ”) denying Mungia-Padilla’s applications for

asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is no precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.