Bondi

Castro Rubio v. Bondi

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 10, 202524-4421California1,125 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUL 10 2025

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA CAMILA CASTRO RUBIO, et al., No. 24-4421 Agency Nos. Petitioners, A241-743-177

A241-743-178

v.

PAMELA BONDI, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted July 7, 2025** Seattle, Washington

Before: HAWKINS, BEA, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Maria Camila Castro-Rubio (“Maria”) and her minor daughter

V.N.P.C. (together, “Petitioners”), both natives and citizens of Colombia, seek

review of a final order of removal issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals

(“BIA”) dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision that

denied their applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.