Tom Love Vinson v. Raymond Madden

Good Law
United States District Court, Central District of CaliforniaJuly 9, 20252:18-cv-06783California997 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 JS-6 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOM LOVE VINSON, Case No. 2:18-cv-06783-FLA (JC)

12 Petitioner,

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS,

13 v. CONCLUSIONS, AND

RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED

14 STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

RAYMOND MADDEN, [DKT. 53] AND DISMISSING

15 Respondent. ACTION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of 2 Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (“Petition,” 3 Dkt. 1) and all of the records herein, including the February 24, 2025 Report and 4 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (the “Report,” Dkt. 53) and 5 Petitioner Tom Love Vinson’s (“Petitioner”) Objections to the Report (“Objection,” 6 Dkt. 57).1 The court has further made a de novo review of those portions of the 7 Report to which Petitioner objected. 8 The Report recommends the denial of the Petition and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.