Green

Green v. Lizarraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20253:22-cv-01175California11,513 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 COREY LAVELLE GREEN, Case No.: 22-cv-1175-DMS-MMP

12 Plaintiff, REPORT AND 13 RECOMMENDATION v. RECOMMENDING THE COURT 14

GRANT IN PART DEFENDANTS’

15 M. LIZARRAGA, et al., MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

16 Defendants. 17 18 This Report and Recommendation is submitted to United States District Judge Dana 19 M. Sabraw pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Civil Local Rule 72.1(c) of the United 20 States District Court for the Southern District of California. Pending before the Court is 21 J. Galindo, M. Lizarraga, and E. Montejano’s (collectively “Defendants”) Motion for 22 Summary Judgment. ECF No. 71. For the reasons set forth herein, the Court 23 RECOMMENDS the Motion for Summary Judgment be GRANTED IN PART and 24 DENIED IN PART. 25 I. BACKGROUND 26 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. His 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action arises 27 from a cell extraction at Centinela State Prison in December 2020. ECF No. 1 at 1,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.