Howard
Howard v. Tanium, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIEL HOWARD, Case No. 21-cv-09703-JSC
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DAUBERT MOTIONS
v. 9 Re: Dkt. Nos. 104-107 10 TANIUM, INC.,
Defendant. 11
12 13 Daniel Howard filed suit against his former employer, Tanium Inc., alleging Tanium 14 fraudulently induced him to join Tanium as an employee. Jury trial is scheduled to commence 15 July 15, 2025. Now pending before the Court are four motions to exclude expert testimony under 16 Federal Rule of Evidence 702. Having carefully reviewed the parties’ submissions, and with the 17 benefit of oral argument on June 25, 2025, the Court GRANTS Tanium’s motion to exclude 18 Phillip Allman’s report and GRANTS in part Tanium’s motions to exclude Jennifer Cohen’s 19 report and Marcia Wagner’s rebuttal report. In addition, the Court GRANTS in part Plaintiff’s 20 motion to exclude Neil Beaton’s report and rebuttal report. 21 BACKGROUND 22 The Court’s summary judgment order details the facts in this case. (Dkt. No. 48.) Briefly, 23 …