Floyd

Floyd v. 24 Hour Fitness USA, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20253:23-cv-00871California4,995 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD, Case No. 23-cv-00871-EMC

8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S SECOND

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

9 v. JUDGMENT

10 24 HOUR FITNESS USA, LLC, Docket No. 127-1 11 Defendant.

12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff Michael Devin Floyd, proceeding pro se, has filed suit against Defendant 24 Hour 15 Fitness USA, LLC (“24H”). Mr. Floyd alleges that 24H violated his rights by, inter alia, having 16 him removed from a gym on two different occasions and then terminating his gym membership. 17 This Court granted 24H’s first motion for summary judgment, dismissing Mr. Floyd’s claims of 18 negligent infliction of emotional distress (NIED), breach of contract, breach of the implied duty to 19 perform with reasonable care, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and a 20 violation of California Business and Professions Code § 17200. Dkt. 130. Before the Court is 21 24H’s second motion for summary judgment on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.