Saleem

Sir Michael Dyess v. Saleem

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20253:24-cv-08608California2,416 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SIR MICHAEL DYESS, Case No. 24-cv-08608-TLT

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING JUDGMENT AND

9 v. REOPENING CASE, OF SERVICE

10 SALEEM, et al., Defendants. 11

12 13 Plaintiff, a state prisoner incarcerated at Salinas Valley State Prison (SVSP), has filed a 14 pro se civil rights action in which he alleges violations of his constitutional rights by SVSP 15 medical personnel. The Court previously dismissed plaintiff’s action for failing to file an 16 application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP). Dkt. No. 10. Plaintiff subsequently filed an IFP 17 application, which will be granted by separate order. See Dkt. No. 14. The Court will vacate the 18 prior judgment (Dkt. No. 11), reopen the case, and order service of the complaint on defendant. 19 DISCUSSION 20 A. Standard of Review 21 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks 22 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.