Windham
Windham v. Howard
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROSALYN ANGELA WINDHAM EL, Case No. 24-cv-09344-WHO
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER DISMISSING CASE FOR
9 v. LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER
JURISDICTION
10 MERCIDEL HOWARD, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 2, 12 Defendants. 11
12 13 On May 12, 2025, Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu issued a Report and Recommendation that 14 I dismiss this case. Dkt. No. 12. The deadline for objections has passed and none was filed.1 15 Having reviewed the record in this case, I agree with Judge Ryu’s recommendation and 16 adopt it in full. On December 23, 2024, se plaintiff Rosalyn Angela Windham El (“Windham”) 17 filed a complaint and an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. Nos. 1 18 (Complaint, or “Compl.”), 2 (IFP Application). Windham alleges that she is a Moorish American 19 National and “ancient American Inhabitant Executor Fiduciary and Successor Trustee of [a] Trust 20 in Fee Simple Absolute,” a property with address 2943 Chestnut St, Emeryville, CA 94608 (the 21 “Property”). See…