Sifuentes

Sifuentes v. Andes

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20254:24-cv-01387California1,718 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MIGUEL G. SIFUENTES, Case No. 24-cv-01387-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING LEAVE TO FILE

PROPOSED AMENDED PETITION

9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 17 10 CHANCE ANDES, 11 Defendant.

12 13 On or about March 8, 2024, Petitioner filed this pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus 14 under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Dkt. No. 1. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES without 15 prejudice Petitioner’s request to file the proposed amended petition docketed at Dkt. No. 17. 16 DISCUSSION 17 I. Background 18 Petitioner commenced this action by filing the habeas petition docketed at Dkt. No. 1. Dkt. 19 No. 1 challenges the denial of his petition for resentencing under Cal. Penal Code § 1172.6, 20 alleging that the state court’s denial of his resentencing petition violated the Due Process Clause 21 because there was insufficient evidence to support his felony murder conviction. Dkt. Nos. 1, 8. 22 On December 9, 2024, Petitioner requested an extension of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.