Ethridge

Ethridge v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)

Good Law
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJuly 10, 20253:25-cv-01452California3,393 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARL ETHRIDGE, Case No.: 25-CV-1452 JLS (KSC)

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER (1) GRANTING

13 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

DISTRICT COURT WITHOUT

14 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

PREPAYING FEES OR COSTS, AND

CORRECTIONS AND

15 (2) DISMISSING COMPLAINT

REHABILITATION, CDCR HEALTH

WITHOUT PREJUDICE

16 CARE SERVICES, and DOE MEDICAL PROVIDERS 1–10, (ECF Nos. 1 & 2) 17 Defendants. 18 19 Presently before the Court is Plaintiff Carl Ethridge’s Complaint (“Compl.,” ECF 20 No. 1) and Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (“IFP 21 Mot.,” ECF No. 2). Having considered both documents and the law, the Court GRANTS 22 Plaintiff’s IFP Motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff’s Complaint. 23 IFP MOTION 24 All parties instituting a civil action, suit, or proceeding in a district court of the 25 United States, except an applicant for writ of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.