McElroy
McElroy v. U.S. District Court Executive Officials
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 LATHWAHN MCELROY, Case No. 25-cv-04374-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE IN
9 v. FORMA PAUPERIS APPLICATION;
DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT
10 U.S. DISTRICT COURT EXECUTIVE PREJUDICE OFFICIALS, et al., 11 Re: Dkt. No. 3 Defendants. 12 13 On May 22, 2025, Plaintiff filed a pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 14 Dkt. No. 1. The complaint names as defendants “U.S. District Court Executive Officials, Does 1 15 to 3, Clerk of Court, Court Mailbox Authority Does 1 to 3 et al.” Dkt. No. 1 at 1-2. The 16 complaint alleges that Plaintiff has suffered “constitutional interference” with his pending cases 17 that have interfered with “efficient private right of legal action;” and that he has severe issues for 18 which he requires an “urgent healthcare compliance order” for an inhaler, and housing at an offsite 19 medical center and free access to petition. See generally Dkt. No. 1. 20 …