(SS)Workman
(SS)Workman v. Commissioner of Social Security
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CRYSTAL ROSE WORKMAN, Case No. 1:25-cv-00826-CDB (SS)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND
13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF THE COURT TO
ISSUE SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER,
14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL AND CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR
SECURITY, REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS
15 Defendant. (Doc. 2) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Crystal Rose Workman (“Plaintiff”) initiated this action with the filing of a 19 complaint on July 9, 2025, seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social 20 Security denying disability insurance and benefits. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee 21 and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (or “IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 22 1915. (Doc. 2). For the following reasons, the Court finds issuance of the new case documents 23 and Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis appropriate. 24 I. Proceeding In Forma Pauperis 25 The Court may authorize the…